“In the gaze of
the other, we see that we have lost the battle and have remained prisoners of
our socially codified identity. Thus, we try to avoid the gaze of the other for
a while, in order to be able to reveal our ‘true self’ after a certain period
of seclusion – to reappear in the public in a new shape, in a new form. This
state of temporary absence helps us to carry what we call the creative process
– in fact, it is itself what we call the creative process.” Boris Groys, ‘In The Flow’ pg. 181/182
“Okay, every 20 minutes you’re disrupting
your flow to see what’s happening on your device. Well, the research will also
tell you that it takes about 15 – 20 minutes from the point of distraction to
get back into your flow to be able to do your deep work and actually cultivate
some creativity. So, if that’s true every 15 – 20 minutes we’re looking at our
devices and it takes about that long to get back into creative flow that means
we’re all living in a perpetual state of distraction.” Giancarlo Pitocco, Podcast
“On the editorial side, technology
platforms can influence – intentionally or not – the types of content that
flourish. Companies provide incentives, including money and advice, which sway
publishers towards creating content that works well on their platforms. This is
not always content with high artistic or civic values, but rather content that
is likely to spread quickly online.” Creative Disruption: The impact of emerging
technologies on the creative economy Pg. 7 – way creativity is being challenged
by Attention Economy
“If imagination can exist outside of
our physical bodies and be consumed like any other commodity, will its relative
value be diminished as it becomes more abundant? The average visitor to an
eighteenth-century Salon would expect to spend an hour or more in front of a
painting, discussing, unravelling meanings, linking narrative and symbolic
strands arising through the contemplation required by religious or historical
art. Is the same concentration and devotion shown to contemporary art-works? Do
we now treat acts of imagination as we treat drinking water? Could it be that
we are now, more than ever, storing our imaginative resources remotely so that
they can be retrieved more conveniently – ‘on tap’?” The Post-Digital Membrane: Imagination, Technology and Desire (Book)
pg.154
“Almost anything and everything is
now in front of the world’s gaze, sifted not by gatekeepers but by public
taste. Indeed, this is the beating heart of most digital business models.
Instead of first selecting and then publishing, you publish first and then
respond to the world’s own selections – relentlessly maximizing those things
that win an audience and wasting little effort on those that don’t.” How To Thrive in the Digital Age (Book),
Tom Chatfield pg. 74-75
“a 2013 study found that the
average user checks their phone 150 times a day, which other research suggests
includes 2,617 touches, taps or swipes. One recent survey even found that one
in ten users has checked their phone during sex. But for Alter, as for most of
us, the bait was so subtle and seductive that the catch didn’t even notice his
mouth clamping around the hook.” The
Twittering Machine (Book), Richard Seymour pg. 53 - Statistics
No comments:
Post a Comment